Farella Braun + Martel LLP

Farella Braun + Martel LLP

A Different Perspective

  • About Us
    • OVERVIEW
    • DIVERSITY STATEMENT
    • PRO-BONO
    • GREEN BUSINESS
    • TECHNOLOGY STATEMENT
    • PRESS KIT
    • AWARDS
  • CUSTOM CONTENT
  • Attorneys
    • SEARCH
    • PRESS RELEASES
    • SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS
  • Practices
    • OVERVIEW
    • Antitrust
    • Bankruptcy & Creditors' Rights
    • Beverage Alcohol Industry
    • Business Litigation
    • Business Transactions
    • Construction
    • Employment
    • Environmental Law
    • Family Wealth
    • Hospitality
    • Insurance Coverage
    • Intellectual Property and Technology
    • Private Clients
    • Product Law
    • Real Estate
    • Securities
    • Tax
    • White Collar Crime
    • Wine
  • Media
    • OVERVIEW
    • PRESS RELEASES
    • SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS
    • MEDIA COVERAGE
    • PUBLICATIONS
    • WEBINARS
    • IP BLAWG
  • Opportunities
    • OVERVIEW
    • LAW STUDENTS
    • LATERAL ATTORNEYS
    • PROFESSIONAL STAFF
  • Contact
    • CONTACT US
    • SIGN UP FOR LAW UPDATES
    • CLIENT EXTRANET
  • Home > Practices & Industries > Intellectual Property and Technology > Digital Technology > Engagements

Practices
& Industries

  • Overview

Print this page

Notable Engagements by Focus Area

  • Copyright
  • Digital Technology
  • Life Sciences
  • Patent
  • Software Performance
  • Trade Secrets
  • Trademark

Digital Technology Engagements

  • AGF Reassurances v. Spar Aerospace Ltd. - We successfully represented this international manufacturer of telecommunications satellites in multi-million dollar claims related to technical malfunctions.  A favorable settlement was reached prior to trial.

  • Dolby Laboratories v. Lucent Technologies – We represented Dolby in seeking a declaratory judgment that Dolby’s AC-3 technology does not infringe patents Lucent had asserted against Dolby’s licensees.  Following protracted litigation, in which we obtained discovery sanctions against Lucent on multiple occasions and attorneys fees at the conclusion of the case, we successfully obtained orders granting summary judgment of non-infringement on the patents-in-suit.  The Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's orders awarding summary judgment and attorney's fees.

  • GTE Wireless v. PCS - We represented GTE Wireless as a plaintiff and counter-defendant in a multi-pronged litigation regarding cellular telephone services carried out simultaneously in federal, state, and bankruptcy court and before the Federal Communications Commission.  The case settled on favorable terms.

  • MIT v. Dolby Laboratories - We defended Dolby Laboratories in an action brought by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology relating to a licensing agreement for the development of digital sound technology used in high definition televisions.   After a jury trial in the District Court in Boston, a favorable settlement was reached for our client.

  • Trimble Navigation, Ltd. v. SiRF Technology, Inc. - We defended SiRF Technology in an infringement action on three patents related to chipsets for use in Global Positioning Systems (GPS) technology.  After a technical tutorial and the assertion of counterclaims based on limited discovery, and the exchange of initial disclosures under the Local Patent Rules, we achieved a favorable settlement for the client which included licenses to additional patents.

  • © 2008 Farella Braun + Martel LLP
  • Employee Access/
  • Privacy Policy/
  • Terms of Use/
  • Site Map
  • Client Extranet